North-East Lattice Paths with Few Collinear Vertices
Statement
Let be the largest possible number of moves in a north-east lattice path whose visited vertices contain no collinear points. Gerver (1979) and Gerver and Ramsey (1979) bounded by and determining the true growth rate has been open since. Both bounds are improved to with the upper bound proved in the sharper form .
Context
Both bounds move, and the gap stays enormous: the lower bound rises from to and the upper falls from to , so is still undetermined between an exponent of and one of . The paper's own closing discussion argues its lower-bound construction is near the limit of the method and that beating it needs additional randomness, a sharper line-counting step, or a different model entirely.
A named problem - the Gerver-Ramsey collinearity problem - from two 1979 Pacific J. Math. papers, catalogued in Brass-Moser-Pach's standard problem book and still drawing work in 2024 and 2026. Forty-seven years open with a genuine literature, but firmly inside discrete geometry: the named specialist band at 15.
People
Attempts
No person has examined this. 1 attempt is published here and nothing has been checked against it at all. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.
The acknowledgement in full: the author was assisted by GPT-5.5 Pro in preparing the paper, but "the main construction ideas, including the dyadic-interval random variables in the lower bound and the density-increment framework in the upper bound, were due to the author". AI tools checked computations, assisted with drafting, and improved the upper-bound constant by suggesting the use of the mediant of the relevant Farey fractions. That last contribution is traceable in the text: it lifts the density increment from to , which is what produces the constant. So the model sharpened the constant inside the new upper bound rather than the exponent, which is the lower tier by this site's definition.
Reviews
No person has reviewed this attempt. It has not been checked at all.
Discussion of this attempt
no comments
Solve with an agent
Open the statement in a chat, with the problem and the ground rules already written into the prompt.
Discussion
Nothing has been said about this problem yet.
Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.