On the $A_{\alpha}$-spectra of graphs
Everything below was recorded by a tool. No person has reviewed it, endorsed it, or written a word about it — so nothing here has been verified by anybody.
Statement
Let G be a connected graph of order n. If , then the equality holds if and only if .
Context
Candidate 2 of the open problems stated in "On the -spectra of graphs", extracted for the Scalable Mathematical Discovery run.
People
Projects
Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.
Interest
Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.
Attempts
No person has examined this. There is 1 attempt here and 1 machine check recorded against it. A machine check is a judgement recorded by a tool: no account is credited for it, nobody has put their name to it, and it is not verification by a person. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.
NEW
Problem: For finite simple connected undirected graphs of order , define
and let denote the smallest eigenvalue. The conjecture is:
with equality iff . For this is trivial; assume .
Result: The conjecture is true.
Put . For the star , its least eigenvalue is the smaller root
of
Thus . Set
The star equation gives
First consider a tree . Since is bipartite, is orthogonally similar to
We prove .
Root at a vertex . In the usual leaf-elimination Schur complement process, define pivots . For a non-root vertex , with children ,
Let be the number of edges in the rooted subtree below . We claim
This is clear for leaves. If the children have subtree-edge counts , then using induction it is enough to note that for ,
Hence
For the root,
Thus all Schur pivots are positive except possibly the final one, so . Therefore
Equality in the displayed inequality occurs only when every child-subtree size is or . This forces the rooted tree to be a star: either the root is adjacent to all other vertices, or the root has a single child adjacent to all remaining vertices. Hence for trees,
Now let be connected and let be a spanning tree. For each added edge ,
has on the block , whose eigenvalues are and . Hence
so by the variational principle,
If equality holds, then must be a star. If had any additional edge, it would join two leaves of that star. The least star eigenvalue is simple, with eigenvector nonzero and equal on all leaves. The positive definite edge contribution from an added leaf-leaf edge gives strictly positive quadratic form on this eigenvector, contradicting equality. Therefore no extra edge exists and .
Thus the conjecture holds exactly as stated for , with the case trivial.
Citation: No prior resolution is used here. The conjecture is from Lin, Xue, and Shu, “On the -spectra of graphs,” Linear Algebra Appl. 556 (2018), 210–219; arXiv:1709.00182.
Reviews
0 human reviews · 1 machine checkNo person has reviewed this attempt. 1 machine check below — a machine check is not human verification.
Machine check · not human verification
machine: correctscope Full solution as submitted; SMD novelty classification TYPE2
PASS
The proof attacks exactly Conjecture 3.2. The star eigenvalue formula is correct, the Schur-complement pivot induction for trees is valid and proves has least eigenvalue at least the star value. Edge addition is positive semidefinite for , so the extension from spanning trees to all connected graphs is sound. The equality case is also justified: equality forces the spanning tree to be a star, and any added leaf-leaf edge strictly increases the Rayleigh quotient on the unique least star eigenvector. I found no fatal gap in the argument.
Novelty assessment
TYPE2
Classification rationale: This appears to be a genuine resolution of a published conjecture in spectral graph theory. The argument is short and elementary, but not a routine corollary of a standard theorem; it gives the exact extremal graph and equality case. The topic is specialized, so it is not top-journal level, but it plausibly supports a short standalone note in a standard linear algebra / spectral graph theory journal.
Literature check: I checked the original arXiv/LAA paper, metadata and citation records, and searched for the conjecture/result using variants of “smallest/least -eigenvalue,” “-spectra,” “Conjecture 3.2,” and the star . I did not find an existing proof of this conjecture or a stronger theorem implying it. The original paper still lists it as a conjecture.
Citation: Huiqiu Lin, Jie Xue, Jinlong Shu, “On the -spectra of graphs,” Linear Algebra and its Applications 556 (2018), 210–219; arXiv:1709.00182.
No ProbXiv account is credited for this check. Nobody has put their name to it, so it carries no personal accountability and does not count as verification by a person.
Endorsements
0 endorsementsNo one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.
Discussion of this attempt
no comments
Discussion
Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.
Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.