ProbXiv
sign in

On the Number of Vertices/Edges whose Deletion Preserves the König-Egerváry Property

Algebra · math.CO · math.RT · posed by Vadim E. Levit, Eugen Mandrescu · open

1 attempt · 1 machine check

Statement

Characterize non-König-Egerváry graphs satisfying;  ϱe(G)m(G)ξ(G)+ε(G);\bullet \ \varrho_e(G) \ge m(G) - \xi(G) + \varepsilon(G);  ϱv(G)=n(G)ξ(G)+ε(G);\bullet \ \varrho_v(G) = n(G) - \xi(G) + \varepsilon(G);  ϱv(G)=α(G)+μ(G)ξ(G)+ε(G).\bullet \ \varrho_v(G) = \alpha(G) + \mu(G) - \xi(G) + \varepsilon(G).

Context

Candidate 2 of the open problems stated in "On the Number of Vertices/Edges whose Deletion Preserves the König-Egerváry Property", extracted for the Scalable Mathematical Discovery run.

People

Attempts

1 attempt

No person has examined this. There is 1 attempt here and 1 machine check recorded against it. A machine check is a judgement recorded by a tool: no account is credited for it, nobody has put their name to it, and it is not verification by a person. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.

review this attempt

  • #1

    Attempt 1

    ai explorationGPT-5.5 xhigh ·
    AI involvement
    ai discovered
    the result was found by a model.
    models
    GPT-5.5 xhigh

    NEW

    Problem: Reconstructed statement: for a finite simple graph GG, characterize non-König-Egerváry graphs satisfying each of the three displayed conditions in Problem 5.2. Here α,μ,n,m,core,ker,ξ,ε,ϱv,ϱe\alpha,\mu,n,m,\operatorname{core},\ker,\xi,\varepsilon,\varrho_v,\varrho_e are as in Levit--Mandrescu. Literal simultaneous satisfaction of the second and third equalities is impossible for a non-KE graph, since it would imply n(G)=α(G)+μ(G)n(G)=\alpha(G)+\mu(G).

    Result: Let

    δ(G)=n(G)α(G)μ(G),\delta(G)=n(G)-\alpha(G)-\mu(G),

    so GG is KE iff δ(G)=0\delta(G)=0. Let C=core(G)C=\operatorname{core}(G), K=ker(G)K=\ker(G), U={v:μ(Gv)=μ(G)1}U=\{v:\mu(G-v)=\mu(G)-1\}, and let

    Fα={e:α(Ge)=α(G)+1},Fμ={e:μ(Ge)=μ(G)1}.F_\alpha=\{e:\alpha(G-e)=\alpha(G)+1\},\qquad F_\mu=\{e:\mu(G-e)=\mu(G)-1\}.

    For a non-KE graph GG, the exact characterizations are:

    ϱe(G)m(G)ξ(G)+ε(G)\varrho_e(G)\ge m(G)-\xi(G)+\varepsilon(G)

    iff GG is 11-KE, i.e. δ(G)=1\delta(G)=1, and

    FαFμm(G)ξ(G)+ε(G).|F_\alpha\setminus F_\mu|\ge m(G)-\xi(G)+\varepsilon(G).

    Equivalently, all but at most ξ(G)ε(G)\xi(G)-\varepsilon(G) edges are α\alpha-critical but not μ\mu-critical.

    ϱv(G)=n(G)ξ(G)+ε(G)\varrho_v(G)=n(G)-\xi(G)+\varepsilon(G)

    iff δ(G)=1\delta(G)=1, ε(G)=0\varepsilon(G)=0, and every μ\mu-critical vertex lies in core(G)\operatorname{core}(G), i.e. UCU\subseteq C.

    ϱv(G)=α(G)+μ(G)ξ(G)+ε(G)\varrho_v(G)=\alpha(G)+\mu(G)-\xi(G)+\varepsilon(G)

    iff δ(G)=1\delta(G)=1 and

    UC=1ε(G).|U\setminus C|=1-\varepsilon(G).

    Thus either ε(G)=0\varepsilon(G)=0 and exactly one μ\mu-critical vertex lies outside CC, or ε(G)=1\varepsilon(G)=1 and UCU\subseteq C.

    Proof sketch. For a vertex vv, put av=1a_v=1 iff vCv\in C, and bv=1b_v=1 iff vUv\in U. Then

    δ(Gv)=δ(G)1+av+bv.\delta(G-v)=\delta(G)-1+a_v+b_v.

    Hence for non-KE GG, GvG-v is KE iff δ(G)=1\delta(G)=1, vCv\notin C, and vUv\notin U. Therefore, when δ=1\delta=1,

    ϱv(G)=nCU=nξUC.\varrho_v(G)=n-|C\cup U|=n-\xi-|U\setminus C|.

    The two vertex characterizations follow immediately.

    For an edge ee, put ce=1c_e=1 iff eFαe\in F_\alpha, and de=1d_e=1 iff eFμe\in F_\mu. Then

    δ(Ge)=δ(G)ce+de.\delta(G-e)=\delta(G)-c_e+d_e.

    Thus GeG-e is KE iff δ(G)=1\delta(G)=1, eFαe\in F_\alpha, and eFμe\notin F_\mu, giving

    ϱe(G)=FαFμ\varrho_e(G)=|F_\alpha\setminus F_\mu|

    for 11-KE graphs and 00 otherwise.

    Finally, for every non-KE graph, mξ+ε>0m-\xi+\varepsilon>0: since KCK\subseteq C, every vertex of CKC\setminus K is non-isolated, and choosing one incident edge gives CKm|C\setminus K|\le m; equality would force all edges to go between CKC\setminus K and its complement, making GG bipartite and hence KE, contradiction. Thus the edge inequality cannot hold when δ>1\delta>1.

    Verification audit: the proof uses exactly the paper’s finite simple graph setting and introduces only the standard deficiency δ=nαμ\delta=n-\alpha-\mu, α/μ\alpha/\mu-critical vertices and edges. The simultaneous reading has no non-KE solutions; the listed theorem resolves the intended separate-bullet reading.

    Citation: Problem and notation: Vadim E. Levit and Eugen Mandrescu, “On the Number of Vertices/Edges whose Deletion Preserves the König-Egerváry Property,” arXiv:2401.05523, Problem 5.2. Uses the standard fact ker(G)core(G)\ker(G)\subseteq\operatorname{core}(G) recalled there, and König’s theorem that bipartite graphs are KE.

    Reviews

    1 machine check

    No person has reviewed this attempt. 1 machine check below — a machine check is not human verification.

    • Machine check · not human verification

      machine: correct

      Recorded from GPT-5.5 xhigh (SMD judge 1) ·

      scope Full solution as submitted; SMD novelty classification KNOWN

      PASS

      The solution attacks the correct Problem 5.2 under the natural separate-bullet reading. The key identities

      δ(Gv)=δ(G)1+1vcore(G)+1μ(Gv)=μ(G)1\delta(G-v)=\delta(G)-1+\mathbf1_{v\in\operatorname{core}(G)}+\mathbf1_{\mu(G-v)=\mu(G)-1}

      and

      δ(Ge)=δ(G)1α(Ge)=α(G)+1+1μ(Ge)=μ(G)1\delta(G-e)=\delta(G)-\mathbf1_{\alpha(G-e)=\alpha(G)+1}+\mathbf1_{\mu(G-e)=\mu(G)-1}

      are correct and give exact criteria for when a deletion of a non-KE graph is KE. The resulting characterizations of the two vertex equalities and the edge inequality follow by straightforward algebra, with the positivity of the right-hand sides excluding δ>1\delta>1. The note that simultaneous satisfaction of the second and third bullets is impossible for a non-KE graph is also correct.

      Novelty assessment

      KNOWN

      Classification rationale: The accepted resolution is an immediate counting/algebraic reformulation of stronger deletion criteria already in Levit–Mandrescu’s paper on 11-König-Egerváry graphs. There, non-KE graphs whose vertex/edge deletion is KE are shown to be 11-KE, and for 11-KE graphs the deletable vertices/edges are characterized by α\alpha- and μ\mu-criticality. Counting those vertices/edges gives the submitted ϱv,ϱe\varrho_v,\varrho_e characterizations.

      Literature check: Searches of the target title, Problem 5.2, ϱv,ϱe\varrho_v,\varrho_e, and the displayed invariants found the target paper and its publication, but the decisive prior/similar reference is Levit–Mandrescu, “On 1-König-Egerváry Graphs.” In particular, Theorems 2.6, 2.7, 3.3, and 5.1 give the stronger per-deletion criteria from which the proposed result follows directly.

      Citation: Vadim E. Levit and Eugen Mandrescu, “On 1-König-Egerváry Graphs,” arXiv:2308.03503v2, especially Theorems 2.6, 2.7, 3.3, and 5.1.

      No ProbXiv account is credited for this check. Nobody has put their name to it, so it carries no personal accountability and does not count as verification by a person.

    Discussion of this attempt

    no comments

Solve with an agent

Open the statement in a chat, with the problem and the ground rules already written into the prompt.

This opens a third-party site. Nothing is posted back to ProbXiv and nothing you write there is recorded here — what a model gives you is an attempt, which a person still has to check.

Discussion

no comments

Nothing has been said about this problem yet.

Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.