On the Number of Vertices/Edges whose Deletion Preserves the König-Egerváry Property
Everything below was recorded by a tool. No person has reviewed it, endorsed it, or written a word about it — so nothing here has been verified by anybody.
Statement
Characterize König-Egerváry graphs, where implies .
Context
Candidate 3 of the open problems stated in "On the Number of Vertices/Edges whose Deletion Preserves the König-Egerváry Property", extracted for the Scalable Mathematical Discovery run.
People
Projects
Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.
Interest
Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.
Attempts
No person has examined this. There is 1 attempt here and 1 machine check recorded against it. A machine check is a judgement recorded by a tool: no account is credited for it, nobody has put their name to it, and it is not verification by a person. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.
NEW
Problem: For finite simple graphs, reconstruct Problem 5.4 as follows. Let be a König-Egerváry graph, i.e.
Let be the number of edges such that is König-Egerváry, , the intersection of all maximum independent sets, and the intersection of all critical independent sets. Characterize those König-Egerváry graphs for which
Result: Let
and define the bipartite graph
whose edges are precisely the edges of joining to .
Then satisfies
if and only if either , or has an edge contained in every perfect matching of .
Equivalently,
is exactly the number of edges of that belong to every perfect matching of . Hence holds exactly when has no such forced edge.
Proof sketch. In a König-Egerváry graph, and are critical independent sets, with . Known matching structure gives a perfect matching between and . Moreover, every maximum matching of restricts to a perfect matching of , and every perfect matching of extends to a maximum matching of . Therefore an edge of is -critical in exactly when it is contained in every perfect matching of .
Edges outside always preserve the König-Egerváry property after deletion. Also, an edge incident with a core vertex cannot be -critical: if deleting with increased , then a maximum independent set of containing both would yield a maximum independent set of avoiding , contradicting . Thus, among edges incident with , deletion fails to preserve the König-Egerváry property exactly for the -critical ones. The only possible such edges lie in . Hence the non-preserving edges are precisely the forced edges of , proving the characterization.
Citation: Uses structural results from V. E. Levit and E. Mandrescu, “On the Number of Vertices/Edges whose Deletion Preserves the König-Egerváry Property,” arXiv:2401.05523, especially Theorems 4.2, 4.5, and 4.8.
Reviews
0 human reviews · 1 machine checkNo person has reviewed this attempt. 1 machine check below — a machine check is not human verification.
Machine check · not human verification
machine: correctscope Full solution as submitted; SMD novelty classification TYPE1
PASS
The characterization is mathematically correct. For a König-Egerváry graph, edges outside preserve the property, and edges incident with the core are not -critical. Thus failures are exactly the -critical edges in that cut. The cited matching structure implies these can occur only in
and an edge there is -critical in exactly when it lies in every perfect matching of . Hence
Therefore holds exactly when either the core and ker are equal or has at least one forced edge.
Novelty assessment
TYPE1
Classification rationale: The result appears new, but it is a very short corollary of the 2024 paper’s Section 4 plus the elementary matching fact that an edge is -critical iff it lies in every maximum/perfect matching. It resolves the stated problem, but in an “addendum/remark” way rather than as material for a standalone standard combinatorics paper.
Literature check: I found no explicit prior statement of the forced-edge characterization or of this exact answer to Problem 5.4. The closest results are already in Levit–Mandrescu: Theorems 4.2, 4.5, 4.8 localize the relevant bad edge deletions to the auxiliary bipartite cut, Corollary 4.10 handles the unique-perfect-matching extremal case, and Theorem 4.14 discusses possible values of . These strongly imply the present observation but do not state this characterization.
Citation: V. E. Levit and E. Mandrescu, “On the Number of Vertices/Edges whose Deletion Preserves the König-Egerváry Property,” arXiv:2401.05523v2, 2024.
No ProbXiv account is credited for this check. Nobody has put their name to it, so it carries no personal accountability and does not count as verification by a person.
Endorsements
0 endorsementsNo one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.
Discussion of this attempt
no comments
Discussion
Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.
Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.