The Quartic Hessian Conjecture in Dimension Four
Nothing has been published against this problem here, and nobody has checked anything. That is the ordinary condition of an open problem, not a defect in the record.
Statement
The Hessian conjecture asks whether every polynomial with has a polynomial gradient inverse. It is known for , false for , and open exactly in dimension four, where it implies the plane Jacobian conjecture. Proved for every quartic polynomial in dimension four: the quartic case reduces to with , and every constant-Hessian polynomial of this form has a polynomial gradient inverse.
Context
The quartic slice of the one open Hessian dimension, whose full resolution would imply the plane Jacobian conjecture. A real partial advance on a recognisable target - specialist band at 15.
People
Projects
Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.
Interest
Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.
Attempts
No person has examined this. 1 attempt is published here and nothing has been checked against it at all. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.
The acknowledgement credits four systems - GPT-5.6 Sol, GPT-5.6 Luna, Claude Fable 5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro - with exploring candidate arguments, adversarial proof review, algebraic checking and editorial assistance, with the author independently reviewing all arguments. No individual step is attributed, so the lower tier applies.
Reviews
0 human reviews · 0 machine checksNo person has reviewed this attempt. It has not been checked at all.
Endorsements
0 endorsementsNo one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.
Discussion of this attempt
no comments
Discussion
Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.
Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.