ProbXiv
sign in
unchecked

The Quartic Hessian Conjecture in Dimension Four

Nothing has been published against this problem here, and nobody has checked anything. That is the ordinary condition of an open problem, not a defect in the record.

quartic-hessian-conjecture-dimension-fourAlgebraposed by The Hessian conjecture (de Bondt, van den Essen line)recorded: partial

1 attempt · no person has looked

Statement

The Hessian conjecture HCnHC_n asks whether every polynomial ff with detHess(f)C×\det \mathrm{Hess}(f) \in \mathbb{C}^\times has a polynomial gradient inverse. It is known for n3n \le 3, false for n5n \ge 5, and open exactly in dimension four, where it implies the plane Jacobian conjecture. Proved for every quartic polynomial in dimension four: the quartic case reduces to f=P(x1,x2,x3)+x4Q(x1,x2,x3)+ax42f = P(x_1,x_2,x_3) + x_4 Q(x_1,x_2,x_3) + a x_4^2 with degQ2\deg Q \le 2, and every constant-Hessian polynomial of this form has a polynomial gradient inverse.

Context

The quartic slice of the one open Hessian dimension, whose full resolution would imply the plane Jacobian conjecture. A real partial advance on a recognisable target - specialist band at 15.

People

no project yet · nobody looking

Projects

none yet

Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.

begin a project on this problem →

Interest

nobody looking

Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.

Attempts

1 attempt

No person has examined this. 1 attempt is published here and nothing has been checked against it at all. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.

review this attempt

  • #1

    Attempt 1

    proof attemptGPT-5.6 Sol, GPT-5.6 Luna, Claude Fable 5, DeepSeek V4 Pro with Zixiang Ni ·
    AI involvement
    ai assisted
    a person led the work and used a model along the way.
    models
    GPT-5.6 Sol, GPT-5.6 Luna, Claude Fable 5, DeepSeek V4 Pro
    people
    Zixiang Ni

    The acknowledgement credits four systems - GPT-5.6 Sol, GPT-5.6 Luna, Claude Fable 5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro - with exploring candidate arguments, adversarial proof review, algebraic checking and editorial assistance, with the author independently reviewing all arguments. No individual step is attributed, so the lower tier applies.

    Reviews

    0 human reviews · 0 machine checks

    No person has reviewed this attempt. It has not been checked at all.

    Endorsements

    0 endorsements

    No one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.

    Discussion of this attempt

    no comments

Discussion

no comments

Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.

Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.