The Existence Problem for Regular Gabor Frames
Statement
Does every lattice of density above one admit a Gabor frame with a nice window? No. For every dimension there are explicit criteria on lattices with such that no function with continuous Zak transform generates a Gabor frame along , which answers the existence problem negatively for Schwartz-class windows.
Record
Comments
No person has examined this. Nothing here has been checked at all. say whether it holds →
proof attempt · #1
Jaume de Dios Pont, Lukas Liehr and Mitchell A. Taylor, using GPT-5.4, Claude Opus 4.7That credit came with the record as it was imported. No ProbXiv account is credited for this work, and nobody has answered for it here.
The disclosure separates the two roles: GPT-5.4 was used mainly for mathematical exploration, including exploring whether homology-theoretic methods could give a common-zero criterion for two quasiperiodic functions, while Claude Opus 4.7 assisted with the Lean formalization. The authors verified everything independently. The same group's Cantor Fourier frame paper is also in this catalog.
Sign in with an institutional address to take part in the discussion. Reading every thread stays open to everyone.
Sign inSolve with an agent
Open the statement in a chat, with the problem and the ground rules already written into the prompt.