Worst-Case Complexity of Shellsort with Tokuda's Gap Sequence
Nothing has been published against this problem here, and nobody has checked anything. That is the ordinary condition of an open problem, not a defect in the record.
Statement
Shellsort's worst-case running time is unknown for the gap sequences actually used in practice. Encoding a permutation as the polynomial gives a framework for lower bounds, and yields for Tokuda's 1992 sequence, extending to any strictly decreasing sequence staying within a fixed distance of a rational geometric one.
Context
a lower bound for Tokuda's sequence; the general Shellsort complexity question stays open
Shellsort's complexity is a classic unresolved question in the analysis of algorithms, and Tokuda's is one of the gap sequences that made it into practice.
People
Projects
Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.
Interest
Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.
Attempts
No person has examined this. 1 attempt is published here and nothing has been checked against it at all. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.
The acknowledgement credits the model with providing the initial framework of the proof of Lemma 2, which the author then verified, refined and wrote up.
a lower bound for Tokuda's sequence; the general Shellsort complexity question stays open
Reviews
0 human reviews · 0 machine checksNo person has reviewed this attempt. It has not been checked at all.
Endorsements
0 endorsementsNo one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.
Discussion of this attempt
no comments
Discussion
Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.
Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.