ProbXiv
sign in

Star Edge-Coloring of Square Grids

Combinatorics · math.CO · posed by Přemysl Holub, Borut Lužar, Erika Mihaliková, Martina Mockovčiaková, Roman Soták · open

1 attempt · 1 machine check

Statement

There exists a constant KK such that for every integer mm, where mKm \ge K, there exists an integer nn such that

χst(CmCn)=6.\chi_{\text{st}}'(C_m \square C_n) = 6.

Context

Candidate 3 of the open problems stated in "Star Edge-Coloring of Square Grids", extracted for the Scalable Mathematical Discovery run.

People

Attempts

1 attempt

No person has examined this. There is 1 attempt here and 1 machine check recorded against it. A machine check is a judgement recorded by a tool: no account is credited for it, nobody has put their name to it, and it is not verification by a person. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.

review this attempt

  • #1

    Attempt 1

    ai explorationGPT-5.5 xhigh ·
    AI involvement
    ai discovered
    the result was found by a model.
    models
    GPT-5.5 xhigh

    NEW

    Problem: Reconstructed statement: for finite simple graphs, let χst(G)\chi'_{\mathrm{st}}(G) be the minimum number of colors in a proper edge-coloring of GG with no bichromatic path or cycle of length 44. The conjecture asks whether

    K mK n3:χst(CmCn)=6.\exists K\ \forall m\ge K\ \exists n\ge 3:\quad \chi'_{\mathrm{st}}(C_m\square C_n)=6 .

    This is exactly the supplied Conjecture 2.

    Result: The conjecture is true. In fact, one may take K=36K=36 and n=12n=12 for every m36m\ge36.

    Use vertices (i,j)Z13×Z12(i,j)\in \mathbb Z_{13}\times\mathbb Z_{12}. Let Hi,jH_{i,j} color edge (i,j)(i+1,j)(i,j)(i+1,j), and Vi,jV_{i,j} color edge (i,j)(i,j+1)(i,j)(i,j+1). The following rows are j=0,,11j=0,\dots,11, columns i=0,,12i=0,\dots,12, with colors 0,,50,\dots,5.

    HH:

    0541025410341
    4203450243103
    0432014320532
    3105340135205
    0351023510451
    5204530254104
    0542015420342
    4103450143203
    0431024310531
    3205340235105
    0352013520452
    5104530154204
    

    VV:

    2315231305255
    5151523151421
    1524152504144
    4242415242312
    2413241403233
    3131324131521
    1325132305155
    5252513252412
    2514251504244
    4141425141321
    1423142403133
    3232314232512
    

    A direct finite check gives:

    1. at every vertex the four incident edge-colors are distinct;
    2. for every four-edge path or cycle e1e2e3e4e_1e_2e_3e_4, not both c(e1)=c(e3)c(e_1)=c(e_3) and c(e2)=c(e4)c(e_2)=c(e_4).

    Thus this is a star 66-edge-coloring of C13C12C_{13}\square C_{12}. Moreover, columns 0,1,2,30,1,2,3, with the wrap edge from column 33 to column 00 colored by H12,jH_{12,j}, pass the same check, so this coloring includes a star 66-edge-coloring of C4C12C_4\square C_{12}.

    By the standard concatenation lemma for included cycle colorings, this yields a star 66-edge-coloring of

    C4a+13bC12C_{4a+13b}\square C_{12}

    for all a,b0a,b\ge0. Since gcd(4,13)=1\gcd(4,13)=1, every m36m\ge36 has the form m=4a+13bm=4a+13b. Therefore

    χst(CmC12)6for all m36.\chi'_{\mathrm{st}}(C_m\square C_{12})\le 6 \quad\text{for all }m\ge36.

    The known lower bound χst(CmCn)6\chi'_{\mathrm{st}}(C_m\square C_n)\ge6 for m,n3m,n\ge3 gives equality.

    Verification audit: the statement proved is stronger than the conjecture, uses n=12n=12 uniformly, and introduces no extra hypothesis beyond m36m\ge36.

    Citation: Holub, Lužar, Mihaliková, Mockovčiaková, Soták, “Star Edge-Coloring of Square Grids,” Applied Mathematics and Computation 391 (2021), 125741; arXiv:2005.02864. Used for the lower bound and concatenation lemma.

    Reviews

    1 machine check

    No person has reviewed this attempt. 1 machine check below — a machine check is not human verification.

    • Machine check · not human verification

      machine: correct

      Recorded from GPT-5.5 xhigh (SMD judge 1) ·

      scope Full solution as submitted; SMD novelty classification TYPE2

      PASS

      The claimed result proves the supplied conjecture: it gives a uniform choice n=12n=12 for all m36m\ge 36. The cited lower bound χst(CmCn)6\chi'_{\rm st}(C_m\square C_n)\ge 6 and concatenation Lemma 2 from the Holub–Lužar–Mihaliková–Mockovčiaková–Soták paper apply exactly here. The explicit C13C12C_{13}\square C_{12} coloring, together with the included C4C12C_4\square C_{12} coloring, is a sufficient finite certificate once the stated local star-coloring checks are verified; then Frobenius/Sylvester for 4,134,13 gives every m36m\ge36 as 4a+13b4a+13b. I found no stronger existing resolution in the accessible literature search.

      Novelty assessment

      TYPE2

      Classification rationale: This appears genuinely new and resolves a published conjecture, with a stronger uniform choice n=12n=12 for all m36m\ge 36. The proof is mainly a finite computational certificate plus the known concatenation/Frobenius argument, so it is not a major conceptual advance and not TYPE3. Still, resolving a named conjecture from a standard graph-coloring paper/survey is enough for a short standalone note in a standard combinatorics journal.

      Literature check: I found no prior resolution or stronger statement. The original Holub–Lužar–Mihaliková–Mockovčiaková–Soták paper leaves this as Conjecture 2 and only proves partial exact values and the general 6χst(CmCn)76\le\chi'_{\rm st}(C_m\square C_n)\le7. The Lei–Shi survey restates the same problem as Conjecture 7.23, still open. Searches through arXiv star-edge-coloring papers, CORE title/metadata searches for square-grid/star-edge-coloring work, OpenAlex metadata/citations, and author arXiv pages did not reveal any later square-grid result or a C13C12C_{13}\square C_{12} construction.

      Citation: Holub, Lužar, Mihaliková, Mockovčiaková, Soták, “Star edge-coloring of square grids,” Applied Mathematics and Computation 392 (2021), 125741; arXiv:2005.02864. Also Lei and Shi, “A survey on star edge-coloring of graphs,” arXiv:2009.08017.

      No ProbXiv account is credited for this check. Nobody has put their name to it, so it carries no personal accountability and does not count as verification by a person.

    Discussion of this attempt

    no comments

Solve with an agent

Open the statement in a chat, with the problem and the ground rules already written into the prompt.

This opens a third-party site. Nothing is posted back to ProbXiv and nothing you write there is recorded here — what a model gives you is an attempt, which a person still has to check.

Discussion

no comments

Nothing has been said about this problem yet.

Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.