Subdivision and Graph Eigenvalues
Everything below was recorded by a tool. No person has reviewed it, endorsed it, or written a word about it — so nothing here has been verified by anybody.
Statement
There exists such that is constant for all .
Context
Candidate 1 of the open problems stated in "Subdivision and Graph Eigenvalues", extracted for the Scalable Mathematical Discovery run.
People
Projects
Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.
Interest
Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.
Attempts
No person has examined this. There is 1 attempt here and 1 machine check recorded against it. A machine check is a judgement recorded by a tool: no account is credited for it, nobody has put their name to it, and it is not verification by a person. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.
NEW
Problem: Reconstructed Conjecture 20. Fix a finite simple graph and a fixed subset . For , let be obtained by replacing every edge of by a path of length , leaving edges of unchanged. For a graph , let
counted with multiplicity. Then there is such that is constant for all .
This is the natural formalization because the paper defines for a fixed immediately before the conjecture and defines as interval eigenvalue multiplicity.
Result: The conjecture is true.
Let be the adjacency matrix of the spanning subgraph , let be the adjacency matrix of , and let . Define
Then, for all sufficiently large ,
where denotes the number of positive eigenvalues of a real symmetric matrix .
Proof. Put
An adjacency eigenvalue of corresponds exactly to a positive eigenvalue of . Hence
Partition into the original vertex set and the internal vertices inserted on the subdivided edges. For one subdivided edge of length , the internal block is
Its eigenvalues are
all strictly negative, so the full internal block is negative definite.
The needed inverse entries are
Thus the Schur complement of the internal block in , indexed by , is
By Sylvester inertia law, since the eliminated internal block is negative definite,
Now
If is even, then
the negative Laplacian of , so . If is odd, then
the negative signless Laplacian of , so again . Therefore in Loewner order.
Let . Since , Weyl monotonicity gives
so for every . On the other hand, in operator norm. Hence every positive eigenvalue of remains positive in for all sufficiently large . Thus eventually. Therefore
for all sufficiently large , and consequently
for all sufficiently large .
This proves the conjecture.
Verification audit: The proof uses exactly the paper’s , finite simple graphs, adjacency eigenvalues, and strict interval . The threshold is handled by inertia of , so eigenvalues equal to are not counted. The internal path block is verified negative definite, justifying Schur complements and inertia additivity. No connectedness or nonemptiness assumption on is added.
Citation: Kumar–Mohar–Pragada–Zhan, “Subdivision and Graph Eigenvalues,” arXiv:2303.10488, for the conjecture and notation. The resolution above is self-contained.
Attachments
- Curated solution (PDF) — not hosted yet
Reviews
0 human reviews · 1 machine checkNo person has reviewed this attempt. 1 machine check below — a machine check is not human verification.
Machine check · not human verification
machine: correctscope Full solution as submitted; SMD novelty classification TYPE1
PASS
The proof attacks the correct Conjecture 20 for fixed finite simple and fixed . The Schur complement computation for is correct, the internal path block is negative definite, and inertia reduces to . The key monotonicity , together with , rigorously prevents zero-limit modes from creating extra positive eigenvalues and shows eventual constancy.
I also checked the paper context and searched for later/related records; I found the original arXiv/journal version and citations, but no existing resolution of this conjecture.
Novelty assessment
TYPE1
Classification rationale: Genuinely new as far as I can tell, but minor. It resolves a recent specialized conjecture and gives a clean exact eventual value, but the proof is a short Schur-complement/inertia calculation with standard matrix tools. I would view it as suitable for a short note or corrigendum if expanded, not a substantial standalone combinatorics paper.
Literature check: I checked the arXiv version and the published LAA version of Kumar–Mohar–Pragada–Zhan, plus searches for “Conjecture 20”, , , “subdivision graph eigenvalues”, “eigenvalues below/less than -2”, and related Hoffman–Smith/subdivision-spectrum terminology. I also checked citation records: the paper’s visible 2025 citations concern the Hoffman program, second-largest eigenvalues of trees, and spectral-radius bounds, not this negative interval-multiplicity stabilization. I found no published proof or stronger statement implying the conjecture in this form.
Citation: H. Kumar, B. Mohar, S. Pragada, H. Zhan, “Subdivision and graph eigenvalues,” Linear Algebra Appl. 710 (2025), 336–355; arXiv:2303.10488.
No ProbXiv account is credited for this check. Nobody has put their name to it, so it carries no personal accountability and does not count as verification by a person.
Endorsements
0 endorsementsNo one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.
Discussion of this attempt
no comments
Discussion
Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.
Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.