ProbXiv
sign in

The Sum-Product Conjecture over the Reals

Combinatorics · posed by Paul Erdos, Endre Szemeredi, 1983 · disproved

1 attempt

Statement

Erdos and Szemeredi conjectured that every finite set of reals satisfies max(A+A,AA)A2o(1)\max(|A+A|,|AA|) \ge |A|^{2-o(1)}. False: there are arbitrarily large ARA \subset \mathbb{R}, of algebraic integers in a number field of degree logA\asymp \log|A|, with max(A+A,AA)A2c\max(|A+A|,|AA|) \le |A|^{2-c} for an absolute c>0c > 0. Variants give counterexamples in function fields of fixed positive characteristic.

Context

the model's contribution is one simplifying lemma; the authors state the main ideas are human

The Erdos-Szemeredi sum-product conjecture is one of the organizing conjectures of additive combinatorics, with a large literature of partial exponents built directly on the expectation that it is true.

People

Attempts

1 attempt

No person has examined this. 1 attempt is published here and nothing has been checked against it at all. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.

review this attempt

  • #1

    Attempt 1

    constructionGPT-5.5 Pro with Thomas F. Bloom, Will Sawin, Carl Schildkraut, Dmitrii Zakharov ·
    AI involvement
    ai assisted
    a person led the work and used a model along the way.
    models
    GPT-5.5 Pro
    people
    Thomas F. Bloom, Will Sawin, Carl Schildkraut, Dmitrii Zakharov

    The limits here matter more than the headline, and the authors state them plainly: GPT-5.5 Pro was a sounding board in the early stages, but the final proof including all the main ideas was almost entirely human-generated, and everything in the paper was written by the authors. The single exception they name is Lemma 3.4, suggested by the model, which replaced a more complicated result of Schinzel with a short elementary argument. There is a second, indirect AI thread: the authors say they were inspired to revisit number fields of large degree by OpenAI's counterexample to the unit distance conjecture, and note their construction needed far less number-theoretic input than that one did.

    Reviews

    No person has reviewed this attempt. It has not been checked at all.

    Discussion of this attempt

    no comments

Solve with an agent

Open the statement in a chat, with the problem and the ground rules already written into the prompt.

This opens a third-party site. Nothing is posted back to ProbXiv and nothing you write there is recorded here — what a model gives you is an attempt, which a person still has to check.

Discussion

no comments

Nothing has been said about this problem yet.

Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.