ProbXiv
sign in
Problem archiveProblem record

Statement

Erdos and Szemeredi conjectured that every finite set of reals satisfies max⁡(∣A+A∣,∣AA∣)≥∣A∣2−o(1)\max(|A+A|,|AA|) \ge |A|^{2-o(1)}. False: there are arbitrarily large A⊂RA \subset \mathbb{R}, of algebraic integers in a number field of degree ≍log⁡∣A∣\asymp \log|A|, with max⁡(∣A+A∣,∣AA∣)≤∣A∣2−c\max(|A+A|,|AA|) \le |A|^{2-c} for an absolute c>0c > 0. Variants give counterexamples in function fields of fixed positive characteristic.

Record

Comments

No person has examined this. Nothing here has been checked at all. say whether it holds →

  1. construction · #1

    Thomas F. Bloom, Will Sawin, Carl Schildkraut and Dmitrii Zakharov, using GPT-5.5 Pro

    That credit came with the record as it was imported. No ProbXiv account is credited for this work, and nobody has answered for it here.

    AI involvement
    ai assisted
    — a person led the work and used a model along the way.

    The limits here matter more than the headline, and the authors state them plainly: GPT-5.5 Pro was a sounding board in the early stages, but the final proof including all the main ideas was almost entirely human-generated, and everything in the paper was written by the authors. The single exception they name is Lemma 3.4, suggested by the model, which replaced a more complicated result of Schinzel with a short elementary argument. There is a second, indirect AI thread: the authors say they were inspired to revisit number fields of large degree by OpenAI's counterexample to the unit distance conjecture, and note their construction needed far less number-theoretic input than that one did.

Sign in with an institutional address to take part in the discussion. Reading every thread stays open to everyone.

Sign in

Solve with an agent

Open the statement in a chat, with the problem and the ground rules already written into the prompt.

This opens a third-party site. Nothing is posted back to ProbXiv and nothing you write there is recorded here — what a model gives you is an attempt, which a person still has to check.