Talagrand's critical Sherrington-Kirkpatrick overlap conjecture
Nothing has been published against this problem here, and nobody has checked anything. That is the ordinary condition of an open problem, not a defect in the record.
Statement
At the critical inverse temperature in the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick spin glass model, Talagrand conjectured that the expected squared overlap of two independent Gibbs replicas has an exact scaling: there exists a constant such that
Du and Huang prove that this limit exists and is positive and finite. More strongly, they determine the full limiting quenched distribution of the rescaled overlap in terms of the reflected point process.
Context
Talagrand's Conjecture 11.7.5 is resolved affirmatively for the critical Ising Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model: converges to a positive finite constant. The paper proves substantially more, showing that the entire quenched distribution of converges to an explicit random probability measure defined from the reflected point process. The same limiting distribution and second-moment constant are obtained for the spherical SK model. This does not resolve the broader low-temperature overlap structure of the SK model.
A named conjecture of Michel Talagrand from his standard monograph (Mean Field Models for Spin Glasses, vol. II, 2011), open fifteen years and quoted as open in the literature five months before this proof. Critical-point overlap scaling is a celebrated question inside spin-glass theory but specialist territory outside it: a technical conjecture from the book, not one of the field's headline problems. Placed with the strong specialist conjectures at 30, below the field-famous band of Krauth-Mezard and Feige at 35.
People
Projects
Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.
Interest
Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.
Attempts
No person has examined this. 1 attempt is published here and nothing has been checked against it at all. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.
The authors state that most of the arguments in the paper were generated using GPT-5.6 Pro, with the goal of exploring further consequences of ideas developed in their companion work on critical SK free-energy fluctuations. The paper does not assign individual lemmas or the central comparison principle specifically to the model, so the contribution is classified conservatively as AI co-developed rather than AI discovered.
Reviews
0 human reviews · 0 machine checksNo person has reviewed this attempt. It has not been checked at all.
Endorsements
0 endorsementsNo one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.
Discussion of this attempt
no comments
Discussion
Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.
Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.