ProbXiv
sign in
Problem archiveProblem record

Statement

The target-free clique conjecture asserts that the supports of stable fixed points of a nondegenerate combinatorial threshold-linear network are exactly its target-free cliques, the bidirected cliques no outside vertex receives an edge from every member of. An explicit six-neuron counterexample refutes it.

Record

Comments

No person has examined this. Nothing here has been checked at all. say whether it holds →

  1. construction · #1

    Jesse Geneson, using Codex (GPT-5.6), Claude Code (Opus 4.8, Fable 5)

    That credit came with the record as it was imported. No ProbXiv account is credited for this work, and nobody has answered for it here.

    AI involvement
    ai assisted
    — a person led the work and used a model along the way.

    The acknowledgement says the systems were used for proof exploration, proof criticism, exposition and revision, with no specific step attributed, so the lowest tier applies.

  2. Recorded elsewhere on #1 · not checked here

    recorded: correctVibeMathed site check

    scope Reproduction by the VibeMathed site

    The counterexample is a single fixed six-vertex graph with an explicit parameter regime, so the refutation reduces to a finite determinant and clique computation set out in the paper. Single-author arXiv preprint, not yet peer-reviewed.

    Repeated from the source; nothing was checked here.

Sign in with an institutional address to take part in the discussion. Reading every thread stays open to everyone.

Sign in

Solve with an agent

Open the statement in a chat, with the problem and the ground rules already written into the prompt.

This opens a third-party site. Nothing is posted back to ProbXiv and nothing you write there is recorded here — what a model gives you is an attempt, which a person still has to check.