ProbXiv
sign in
machine only

The Eigen-Cover Ratio of a Graph: Asymptotes, Domination and Areas

Everything below was recorded by a tool. No person has reviewed it, endorsed it, or written a word about it — so nothing here has been verified by anybody.

the-eigen-cover-ratio-of-a-graph-asymptotes-domination-and-areasCombinatoricsmath.COposed by Paul August Winter, Carol Lynne Jessoprecorded: open · 1 machine check, unexamined

1 attempt · 1 machine check · no person has looked

Statement

The complete graph possesses the largest eigen-cover area of all classes of graphs.

Context

Candidate 1 of the open problems stated in "The Eigen-Cover Ratio of a Graph: Asymptotes, Domination and Areas", extracted for the Scalable Mathematical Discovery run.

People

no project yet · nobody looking

Projects

none yet

Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.

begin a project on this problem →

Interest

nobody looking

Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.

Attempts

1 attempt

No person has examined this. There is 1 attempt here and 1 machine check recorded against it. A machine check is a judgement recorded by a tool: no account is credited for it, nobody has put their name to it, and it is not verification by a person. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.

review this attempt

  • #1

    Attempt 1

    ai explorationGPT-5.5 xhigh ·
    AI involvement
    ai discovered
    the result was found by a model.
    models
    GPT-5.5 xhigh

    NEW

    Problem: For a finite simple connected graph GG of order n3n\ge3, let

    E(G)=iλiE(G)=\sum_i|\lambda_i|

    be its graph energy. If SS is a minimum vertex cover and H=G[S]H=G[S], define E^(H)=E(H)\widehat E(H)=E(H), except that E^(H)=1\widehat E(H)=1 when HH is edgeless. The paper’s eigen-cover ratio is

    ρ(G,S)=SE^(H)nE(G).\rho(G,S)=\frac{|S|\,\widehat E(H)}{nE(G)}.

    For a graph class F=(Gn)\mathcal F=(G_n), its eigen-cover area is obtained by integrating the ratio function in nn, multiplied by average degree. The paper does not specify a unique real interpolation from integer orders; below I prove the natural repaired form, e.g. for the standard piecewise-linear interpolation used to make the integral rigorous.

    Result: The complete graph is pointwise maximal for the eigen-cover ratio, hence it has maximal eigen-cover area under the natural interpolation convention.

    Let GG be connected, non-complete, with n3n\ge3, and let SS be a minimum vertex cover. Since H=G[S]H=G[S] is an induced subgraph, A(H)A(H) is a principal submatrix of A(G)A(G). Graph energy is the nuclear norm of the adjacency matrix, so

    E(H)=A(H)A(G)=E(G).E(H)=\|A(H)\|_*\le \|A(G)\|_*=E(G).

    If HH is edgeless, then E^(H)=1E(G)\widehat E(H)=1\le E(G), since connected GG contains an edge and thus E(G)E(K2)=2E(G)\ge E(K_2)=2. Therefore always

    E^(H)E(G).\widehat E(H)\le E(G).

    Because GKnG\neq K_n, there are two nonadjacent vertices u,vu,v. Then V(G){u,v}V(G)\setminus\{u,v\} is a vertex cover, so

    Sn2.|S|\le n-2.

    Thus

    ρ(G,S)=SE^(H)nE(G)Snn2n.\rho(G,S)=\frac{|S|\widehat E(H)}{nE(G)} \le \frac{|S|}{n} \le \frac{n-2}{n}.

    For KnK_n, a minimum vertex cover has size n1n-1, and its cover graph is Kn1K_{n-1}. Since E(Kn)=2(n1)E(K_n)=2(n-1) and E(Kn1)=2(n2)E(K_{n-1})=2(n-2),

    ρ(Kn)=(n1)2(n2)n2(n1)=n2n.\rho(K_n)=\frac{(n-1)2(n-2)}{n\,2(n-1)} =\frac{n-2}{n}.

    So KnK_n maximizes the eigen-cover ratio at every order n3n\ge3.

    For area, let b(x)=(x2)/xb(x)=(x-2)/x. The piecewise-linear interpolation of any class ratio lies below the interpolation of b(n)b(n), and since bb is concave on [2,)[2,\infty), it lies below b(x)b(x). Also 2m/nn12m/n\le n-1, with equality for KnK_n. Hence every class satisfies

    AF(n)(n1)2nx2xdx=(n1)(n2logn+2log22),A_{\mathcal F}(n)\le (n-1)\int_2^n \frac{x-2}{x}\,dx = (n-1)(n-2\log n+2\log2-2),

    which is exactly the complete-graph area computed in the paper.

    Citation: Definitions and conjecture: P. A. Winter and C. L. Jessop, “The Eigen-Cover Ratio of a Graph: Asymptotes, Domination and Areas,” viXra:1503.0148. No prior published proof is invoked here.

    Reviews

    0 human reviews · 1 machine check

    No person has reviewed this attempt. 1 machine check below — a machine check is not human verification.

    • Machine check · not human verification

      machine: correct

      Recorded from GPT-5.5 xhigh (SMD judge 1) ·

      scope Full solution as submitted; SMD novelty classification TYPE1

      PASS

      The proof is sound under the stated/natural formalization of the paper’s area definition. It correctly shows E(G[S])E(G)E(G[S])\le E(G) via trace-norm monotonicity for principal submatrices, and that any non-complete connected graph has a vertex cover of size at most n2n-2. Hence ρ(G,S)(n2)/n=ρ(Kn)\rho(G,S)\le (n-2)/n=\rho(K_n). Since average degree is also maximized by KnK_n, the corresponding area bound follows for the standard interpolation convention.

      Novelty assessment

      TYPE1

      Classification rationale: The result appears genuinely new as an explicit resolution of this very specific conjecture, but it is minor. The proof is essentially an immediate consequence of standard nuclear-norm monotonicity for principal submatrices plus the elementary fact that a non-complete graph has a vertex cover of size at most n2n-2. The invariant is bespoke, introduced in a viXra paper, and the “area” definition is somewhat under-specified without an interpolation convention. This would not support a standalone journal paper; at most it is a short note/comment.

      Literature check: I found no prior explicit proof or stronger statement about the “eigen-cover ratio/area” conjecture. Searches for exact phrases “eigen-cover ratio”, “eigen-cover area”, “The Eigen-Cover Ratio of a Graph”, and variants without the hyphen gave no arXiv hits. GitHub repository/issue searches and Internet Archive full-text searches for the same phrases and for “complete graph” + “eigen-cover area” also gave no relevant hits. Broader arXiv searches for “vertex cover” + “graph energy” found unrelated work on lower bounds for graph energy in terms of vertex-cover number, and searches for “cover energy” found Winter’s earlier “3-covering energy” papers, not this conjecture.

      Citation: P. A. Winter and C. L. Jessop, “The Eigen-Cover Ratio of a Graph: Asymptotes, Domination and Areas,” viXra:1504.0042, 2015. Standard background: V. Nikiforov, “The energy of graphs and matrices,” J. Math. Anal. Appl. 326 (2007), 1472–1475.

      No ProbXiv account is credited for this check. Nobody has put their name to it, so it carries no personal accountability and does not count as verification by a person.

    Endorsements

    0 endorsements

    No one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.

    Discussion of this attempt

    no comments

Discussion

no comments

Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.

Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.