ProbXiv
sign in
Problem archiveProblem record

Statement

What is the minimax optimal error rate for density estimation when observations are perturbed by Wasserstein-bounded contaminations? Chao and Dobriban's 2023 preprint left a gap between upper and lower bounds; the sharp rate is now derived, closing the problem.

Record

Added

Comments

No person has examined this. Nothing here has been checked at all. say whether it holds →

  1. proof attempt · #1

    Edgar Dobriban, using GPT-5 Pro

    That credit came with the record as it was imported. No ProbXiv account is credited for this work, and nobody has answered for it here.

    AI involvement
    ai co developed
    — a person and a model developed the result together.

    A note written expressly to document the workflow: starting October 2025, "making significant use of GPT-5 Pro, we were able to derive the minimax optimal error rate." The model suggested calculations the authors had not thought of and techniques unfamiliar to them; the note also records the AI's limitations in its own section.

Sign in with an institutional address to take part in the discussion. Reading every thread stays open to everyone.

Sign in

Solve with an agent

Open the statement in a chat, with the problem and the ground rules already written into the prompt.

This opens a third-party site. Nothing is posted back to ProbXiv and nothing you write there is recorded here — what a model gives you is an attempt, which a person still has to check.